mirror of
https://github.com/kiddin9/op-packages.git
synced 2026-09-12 03:14:48 +08:00
119 lines
4.2 KiB
Bash
Executable File
119 lines
4.2 KiB
Bash
Executable File
#!/bin/sh
|
||
# 菜单按键覆盖契约。
|
||
#
|
||
# 背景: 传统菜单是"echo 打印选项 + case 分支处理"两处独立维护，容易漂移。
|
||
# 实测发现两处功能因此完全打不开:
|
||
# backup_restore_menu 打印 1..5，case 只有 1) 2) 3) c) d)
|
||
# -> 选 4(查看备份列表) / 5(从最新备份恢复) 落到 *) "无效选择"，
|
||
# 真正的逻辑挂在从不显示的 c / d 上
|
||
# reset_to_defaults 打印 1..4，case 只有 1) 2) 3) c)
|
||
# -> 选 4(完全恢复出厂) 同样不可达
|
||
#
|
||
# 本测试对每个传统菜单函数比对"打印出来的按键集合"与"case 覆盖的按键集合"，
|
||
# 两者必须完全一致，避免再出现"按提示操作却提示无效选择"。
|
||
set -eu
|
||
|
||
SCRIPT_DIR=$(CDPATH= cd -- "$(dirname "$0")" && pwd)
|
||
REPO_ROOT=$(CDPATH= cd -- "$SCRIPT_DIR/.." && pwd)
|
||
SH_CONFIG="$REPO_ROOT/root/usr/share/openclaw/oc-config.sh"
|
||
|
||
fail() {
|
||
echo "FAIL: $1" >&2
|
||
exit 1
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
[ -f "$SH_CONFIG" ] || fail "missing $SH_CONFIG"
|
||
|
||
# 待校验的菜单函数。这些函数都遵循 "echo -e \" ${CYAN}N)${NC} ...\"" +
|
||
# "case \$choice in N) ... esac" 的结构。
|
||
MENUS="reset_to_defaults backup_restore_menu advanced_menu"
|
||
|
||
for fn in $MENUS; do
|
||
grep -q "^${fn}()" "$SH_CONFIG" || fail "menu function ${fn}() not found"
|
||
|
||
# 打印出来的按键: 形如 ${CYAN}4)${NC}
|
||
printed=$(awk -v f="^${fn}\\\\(\\\\)" '
|
||
$0 ~ f { inside = 1 }
|
||
inside && /^\}$/ { inside = 0 }
|
||
inside && match($0, /\{CYAN\}[0-9a-z]+\)/) {
|
||
s = substr($0, RSTART + 6, RLENGTH - 7)
|
||
print s
|
||
}
|
||
' "$SH_CONFIG" | sort -u | tr '\n' ' ')
|
||
|
||
# case 覆盖的按键。
|
||
# 注意各菜单的外层 case 缩进不同 (advanced_menu 的 case 嵌在 while 里，
|
||
# 比另外两个深一层)，且分支内可能有嵌套 case (如 auto|lan|... / true|false)。
|
||
# 因此先定位该函数第一个 "case ... in" 的缩进，只采集与之相同缩进 + 1 个
|
||
# 制表符的标签行，避免把嵌套 case 的取值误判成菜单按键。
|
||
handled=$(awk -v f="$fn" '
|
||
index($0, f "()") == 1 { inside = 1 }
|
||
inside && /^\}$/ { inside = 0 }
|
||
inside && !depth_found && match($0, /^\t*case .* in$/) {
|
||
# 记录外层 case 的制表符数量
|
||
ct = 0
|
||
while (substr($0, ct + 1, 1) == "\t") ct++
|
||
label_prefix = ""
|
||
for (i = 0; i <= ct; i++) label_prefix = label_prefix "\t"
|
||
depth_found = 1
|
||
next
|
||
}
|
||
inside && depth_found {
|
||
# 只接受恰好位于外层 case 分支缩进的标签行
|
||
if (index($0, label_prefix) == 1 && substr($0, length(label_prefix) + 1, 1) != "\t") {
|
||
line = substr($0, length(label_prefix) + 1)
|
||
if (match(line, /^[0-9a-z][0-9a-z|"]*\)/)) {
|
||
sub(/\).*$/, "", line)
|
||
n = split(line, parts, "|")
|
||
for (i = 1; i <= n; i++) {
|
||
gsub(/"/, "", parts[i])
|
||
if (parts[i] != "") print parts[i]
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
' "$SH_CONFIG" | sort -u | tr '\n' ' ')
|
||
|
||
[ -n "$printed" ] || fail "${fn}: no printed menu keys detected (parser drift?)"
|
||
[ -n "$handled" ] || fail "${fn}: no case labels detected (parser drift?)"
|
||
|
||
# 打印了但没有分支处理 -> 用户按提示操作会得到"无效选择"
|
||
for k in $printed; do
|
||
case " $handled " in
|
||
*" $k "*) ;;
|
||
*) fail "${fn}: menu offers '$k' but no case branch handles it (option is unreachable)" ;;
|
||
esac
|
||
done
|
||
|
||
# 有分支但从不显示 -> 隐藏功能，说明键位错位
|
||
for k in $handled; do
|
||
case " $printed " in
|
||
*" $k "*) ;;
|
||
*) fail "${fn}: case handles '$k' but the menu never offers it (orphaned branch)" ;;
|
||
esac
|
||
done
|
||
done
|
||
|
||
# 回归钉子: 这两个功能曾经挂在不显示的 c/d 上。
|
||
#
|
||
# 注意不要在 grep 模式里写 \t: BusyBox grep 会把它当制表符，
|
||
# 而 GNU grep (CI runner) 当作字面字符 t —— 同一个断言在两边结果相反。
|
||
# 这里用 awk 判断行首制表符，避免依赖 grep 的转义方言。
|
||
has_case_label() {
|
||
awk -v fn="$1" -v key="$2" '
|
||
index($0, fn "()") == 1 { inside = 1 }
|
||
inside && /^\}$/ { inside = 0 }
|
||
inside && $0 == "\t\t" key ")" { found = 1 }
|
||
END { exit(found ? 0 : 1) }
|
||
' "$SH_CONFIG"
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
has_case_label backup_restore_menu 4 \
|
||
|| fail "backup menu option 4 (list backups) must be reachable"
|
||
has_case_label backup_restore_menu 5 \
|
||
|| fail "backup menu option 5 (restore from latest) must be reachable"
|
||
has_case_label reset_to_defaults 4 \
|
||
|| fail "reset menu option 4 (factory reset) must be reachable"
|
||
|
||
echo "ok"
|